🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.