🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities funds the expense of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart mammals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a role that required earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the subtleties and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting natures.

“One whale selected me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Both altered the way I understand connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales progressed against a context of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, died. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the park links to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and 24/7 attention than any individual in the Britain, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was released shortly thereafter.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She supports calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In late September, Canada’s government official turned down a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in good conscience authorize an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments reveal a wider incorrect perception of the circumstances of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a solution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The planned site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ future.

Others say the prospect of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the short term.

The project lead, director of the plan, said the facility will simulate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|